Polymorphisms, mutations, and amplification of the EGFR gene in non-small cell lung cancers
2007

EGFR Polymorphisms in Lung Cancer

Sample size: 556 publication 10 minutes Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Masaharu Nomura, Hisayuki Shigematsu, Li Lin, Makoto Suzuki, Takao Takahashi, Pila Estess, Mark Siegelman, Ziding Feng, Harubumi Kato, Antonio Marchetti, Jerry W Shay, Margaret R Spitz, Ignacio I Wistuba, John D Minna, Adi F Gazdar

Primary Institution: University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center

Hypothesis

The study aims to examine the distributions of three EGFR polymorphisms and their relationships to each other and to EGFR gene mutations in non-small cell lung cancers.

Conclusion

The three polymorphisms associated with increased EGFR protein production were found to be rare in East Asians compared to other ethnicities, suggesting that East Asians may produce less intrinsic EGFR protein.

Supporting Evidence

  • Shorter alleles of CA-SSR1 and minor forms of SNPs −216 and −191 were less frequent in East Asians.
  • EGFR mutations were more common in NSCLCs in East Asians than in individuals of European descent.
  • Mutations occurred more often in tumors with allelic imbalance.
  • Monoallelic amplification of the CA-SSR1 locus was present in 30.6% of informative cases.

Takeaway

The study found that certain genetic variations related to the EGFR gene are less common in East Asians, which might explain why they respond differently to lung cancer treatments.

Methodology

The study examined the frequencies of three EGFR polymorphisms in lung cancer samples and corresponding non-malignant tissues from various ethnic groups.

Potential Biases

Potential biases may arise from the selection of samples and the ethnic composition of the study population.

Limitations

The study's findings may not be generalizable to all populations due to the specific ethnic groups studied.

Participant Demographics

The study included 336 East Asians, 213 individuals of Northern European descent, and 7 of other ethnicities.

Statistical Information

P-Value

p < 0.001

Confidence Interval

95% confidence interval: 34.1%–54.7%

Statistical Significance

p < 0.001

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1371/journal.pmed.0040125

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication