The influence of epidural anesthesia on new-born hearing screening: A pilot study
2011

Epidural Anesthesia and Newborn Hearing Screening

Sample size: 40 publication Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Khoza-Shangase Katijah, Joubert Karin

Primary Institution: University of the Witwatersrand

Hypothesis

Does epidural anesthesia influence newborn hearing screening results in infants born via elective Cesarean section?

Conclusion

Epidural anesthesia may lead to increased false positive results in newborn hearing screenings conducted within the first four hours after birth.

Supporting Evidence

  • Hearing screening results indicated that testing earlier than four hours after birth yielded more false positives.
  • Statistically significant findings were obtained regarding the influence of epidural anesthesia on AABR results.
  • TEOAE screening is more reliable when conducted after 24 hours post-birth.

Takeaway

This study looked at whether epidural anesthesia affects hearing tests for newborns. It found that testing too soon after birth can give wrong results.

Methodology

A prospective quasi-experimental repeated measures design with a comparison group was used to screen 40 newborns at three different times.

Potential Biases

Potential bias due to the nonprobability sampling strategy and the small sample size.

Limitations

The small sample size limits the generalizability of the results.

Participant Demographics

Newborns born to mothers who underwent either epidural anesthesia during Cesarean section or natural delivery.

Statistical Information

P-Value

0.00001

Statistical Significance

p<0.05

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.4103/0975-7406.76493

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication