Service Attributes and Acceptability of Digital and Nondigital Depression Management Methods Among Individuals With Depressive Symptoms: Survey Study
2024

Digital and Nondigital Depression Management Methods: User Preferences

Sample size: 114 publication 10 minutes Evidence: high

Author Information

Author(s): Mavragani Amaryllis, Reuther Christina, Auyeung Larry MPH, PhD, Mak Winnie W S PhD, Tsang Ella Zoe MSSc

Primary Institution: The Chinese University of Hong Kong

Hypothesis

What service characteristics do users value in digital and nondigital mental health treatments?

Conclusion

Users value multiple service attributes beyond effectiveness in depression management methods, with digital services showing specific strengths.

Supporting Evidence

  • Effectiveness was ranked as the most important attribute by participants.
  • Privacy, credibility, and cost were also highly valued attributes.
  • Face-to-face psychological intervention was rated as the most effective method.
  • Digital services were perceived as having specific strengths compared to nondigital services.
  • Participants showed a willingness to adopt guided internet-based psychological interventions.

Takeaway

People with depression care about more than just how effective a treatment is; they also want it to be private, credible, and affordable.

Methodology

A web-based questionnaire was completed by participants measuring their awareness and adoption of digital mental health services and their valuation of psychological service attributes.

Potential Biases

Potential bias due to self-reported data and the use of a non-validated survey.

Limitations

The study was conducted online, which may bias results towards individuals with higher e-literacy.

Participant Demographics

Mean age of 26.8 years, 77.2% women, 64% had no prior diagnosis of mental disorders, and 59.6% reported at least moderately severe depressive symptoms.

Statistical Information

P-Value

p<0.001

Statistical Significance

p<0.05

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.2196/55450

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication