Effect of Margin Design on Captek Restorations
Author Information
Author(s): Amy Shih, Robert Flinton, Jayalakshmi Vaidyanathan, Tritala Vaidyanathan
Primary Institution: New Jersey Dental School, UMDNJ
Hypothesis
Do different margin designs and processing steps affect the marginal adaptation of Captek restorations?
Conclusion
Captek restorations generally show clinically acceptable marginal discrepancies, with designs featuring bevels performing better.
Supporting Evidence
- Margin gaps decreased in the order Stage 3 < Stage 1 < Stage 2.
- Restorations with bevels showed lower margin gaps in stages 1 and 2.
- Captek restorations typically demonstrated clinically acceptable range of marginal adaptation.
Takeaway
This study looked at how different edge shapes on dental crowns affect how well they fit. It found that some shapes fit better than others.
Methodology
The study used repeated measures ANOVA to analyze the marginal gaps of 24 Captek crowns with four different margin designs across three processing stages.
Limitations
The study was limited to a specific type of restoration and may not generalize to all dental materials.
Statistical Information
P-Value
p<0.001
Statistical Significance
p<0.05
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
Want to read the original?
Access the complete publication on the publisher's website