Impact of peritoneal cytology on survival of endometrial cancer patients treated with surgery and radiotherapy
2003

Impact of Peritoneal Cytology on Survival in Endometrial Cancer

Sample size: 170 publication 10 minutes Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Tebeu P M, Popowski G Y, Verkooijen H M, Casals J, Lüdicke F, Zeciri G, Usel M, Bouchardy C, Major A L

Primary Institution: Geneva University Hospitals

Hypothesis

Does positive peritoneal cytology affect the survival of endometrial cancer patients treated with surgery and radiotherapy?

Conclusion

Positive peritoneal cytology does not independently affect survival in endometrial cancer patients treated with surgery and radiotherapy.

Supporting Evidence

  • Patients with cytological stage IIIA had a 5-year disease-specific survival rate of 94%.
  • Patients with histological stage IIIA had a significantly lower 5-year disease-specific survival rate of 51%.
  • The study included 170 patients, representing about 50% of all endometrial cancer patients treated in the public sector during the study period.
  • Positive peritoneal cytology did not significantly change survival outcomes compared to stage I cancer.
  • Statistical analyses were performed using the Kaplan–Meier method and Cox's proportional-hazards regression.

Takeaway

This study found that women with endometrial cancer and positive peritoneal cytology have similar survival rates to those whose cancer is confined to the uterus.

Methodology

The study included women who underwent surgery and radiotherapy for endometrial cancer, analyzing survival rates based on peritoneal cytology results.

Potential Biases

Patients were selected based on receiving radiotherapy, which may introduce selection bias.

Limitations

The study excluded patients without peritoneal cytology assessment and had a relatively low statistical power due to the limited number of patients.

Participant Demographics

The mean age of participants was 64.7 years, with a mix of stages and treatment types.

Statistical Information

P-Value

0.008

Confidence Interval

95% CI 0.3–2.0

Statistical Significance

p<0.05

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1038/sj.bjc.6601446

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication