Playground Renovations and Quality at Public Parks in Boston
Author Information
Author(s): Barrett Jessica L., Hannon Cynthia, Keefe Linda Fitz, Gortmaker Steven L., Cradock Angie L.
Primary Institution: Harvard School of Public Health
Hypothesis
The study aimed to estimate and compare playground renovation rates across Boston areas before and after a playground quality assessment.
Conclusion
The findings indicate an equitable rate of playground renovation across city areas according to need.
Supporting Evidence
- 62 of the 103 parks assessed were renovated between 1996 and 2007.
- Playground quality scores improved from a mean of 38.3 at baseline to 64.6 at follow-up.
- Parks in disadvantaged areas were renovated at a rate similar to those in other areas after baseline.
Takeaway
The study looked at how playgrounds in Boston were fixed up over time and found that the ones in need got attention just like the others.
Methodology
An observational pretest-posttest design was used to estimate playground renovation rates and assess changes in playground quality.
Potential Biases
The observational design without a control group may introduce bias in the results.
Limitations
The study was limited to one city and lacked a comparison community, which may affect the generalizability of the findings.
Participant Demographics
In the 2000 US Census, Boston had 589,141 residents, with 20% under 18 years, and a significant portion from disadvantaged backgrounds.
Statistical Information
P-Value
p<0.001
Confidence Interval
95% CI, 35.3-41.3
Statistical Significance
p<0.05
Want to read the original?
Access the complete publication on the publisher's website