Improving the use of research evidence in guideline development: 3. Group composition and consultation process
2006

Improving Research Evidence in Guideline Development

publication Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Atle Fretheim, Holger J. Schünemann, Andrew D. Oxman

Primary Institution: Norwegian Knowledge Centre for the Health Services

Hypothesis

What should be the composition of a WHO-panel that is set up to develop recommendations?

Conclusion

The composition of guideline development groups significantly impacts the recommendations made, and a multidisciplinary approach is recommended.

Supporting Evidence

  • Multidisciplinary groups are more likely to produce valid guidelines.
  • Consultations should include a wide range of stakeholders.
  • Training and support for group members can enhance participation.

Takeaway

When making health care guidelines, it's important to have a diverse group of people involved to make better decisions.

Methodology

The review was based on existing systematic reviews and methodological research found in databases like PubMed.

Potential Biases

Expert recommendations may be biased towards their specialties, leading to less objective guidelines.

Limitations

The research evidence on optimal group composition and consultation processes is limited.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1186/1478-4505-4-15

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication