LongSAGE profiling of nine human embryonic stem cell lines
2007

LongSAGE Profiling of Human Embryonic Stem Cells

Sample size: 9 publication Evidence: high

Author Information

Author(s): Hirst Martin, Delaney Allen, Rogers Sean A, Schnerch Angelique, Persaud Deryck R, O'Connor Michael D, Zeng Thomas, Moksa Michelle, Fichter Keith, Mah Diana, Go Anne, Morin Ryan D, Baross Agnes, Zhao Yongjun, Khattra Jaswinder, Prabhu Anna-Liisa, Pandoh Pawan, McDonald Helen, Asano Jennifer, Dhalla Noreen, Ma Kevin, Lee Stephanie, Ally Adrian, Chahal Neil, Menzies Stephanie, Siddiqui Asim, Holt Robert, Jones Steven, Gerhard Daniela S, Thomson James A, Eaves Connie J, Marra Marco A

Primary Institution: Genome Sciences Centre, British Columbia Cancer Agency

Hypothesis

What are the unique transcriptomes of human embryonic stem cells compared to differentiated cells?

Conclusion

The study identified an enrichment of RNA binding proteins and novel transcripts specific to human embryonic stem cells.

Supporting Evidence

  • The study generated 2.5 million LongSAGE tags from nine human embryonic stem cell lines.
  • ESCs express more RNA binding proteins compared to differentiated cells.
  • The analysis identified novel ESC-specific transcripts.
  • Statistical tests showed significant differences in transcript expression patterns.

Takeaway

Scientists studied special cells called embryonic stem cells to find new genes that help them stay young and not turn into other types of cells.

Methodology

The researchers used LongSAGE to generate 2.5 million tags from nine human embryonic stem cell lines to analyze their transcriptomes.

Potential Biases

Potential biases from the sequencing technology and the exclusion of certain transcripts.

Limitations

The study may have biases due to the limitations of the LongSAGE technology and the complexity of the transcriptome.

Participant Demographics

The study involved nine human embryonic stem cell lines, with varying characteristics.

Statistical Information

P-Value

1.8 × 10-7

Statistical Significance

p<0.05

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1186/gb-2007-8-6-r113

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication