Core verbal autopsy procedures with comparative validation results from two countries
2006

Core Verbal Autopsy Procedures with Validation Results from Two Countries

Sample size: 50000 publication 10 minutes Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Setel Philip W, Rao Chalapati, Hemed Yusuf, Whiting David R, Yang Gonghuan, Chandramohan Daniel, Alberti K. G. M. M, Lopez Alan D

Primary Institution: University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill

Hypothesis

Can standardized verbal autopsy procedures provide accurate cause-of-death data in different countries?

Conclusion

The procedures can provide reasonable mortality estimates for several common causes of death in Tanzania and China, but their performance varies by setting.

Supporting Evidence

  • The verbal autopsy procedures were developed over 12 years and applied to over 50,000 deaths.
  • The study found that the procedures could be adapted for use in different cultural contexts.
  • Validation studies are essential when applying verbal autopsy procedures in new settings.

Takeaway

This study shows that a method called verbal autopsy can help figure out why people die in places where doctors can't always write down the cause of death.

Methodology

The study involved developing verbal autopsy forms and validating them through interviews and medical records in Tanzania and China.

Potential Biases

Potential biases may arise from the interviewers' interpretations and the cultural context of the interviews.

Limitations

The performance of verbal autopsy procedures varied between countries due to differences in disease prevalence.

Participant Demographics

Participants included families of deceased individuals in urban and rural areas of Tanzania and China.

Statistical Information

Confidence Interval

95%

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1371/journal.pmed.0030268

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication