Molecular Diet Analysis of Free-Tailed Bats
Author Information
Author(s): Bohmann Kristine, Monadjem Ara, Lehmkuhl Noer Christina, Rasmussen Morten, Zeale Matt R. K., Clare Elizabeth, Jones Gareth, Willerslev Eske, Gilbert M. Thomas P.
Primary Institution: Centre for GeoGenetics, Natural History Museum of Denmark
Hypothesis
Resource partitioning may actually be minimal between the two species, particularly in areas of high insect diversity and abundance.
Conclusion
The study found little evidence of resource partitioning between the two bat species in their diets.
Supporting Evidence
- The study identified 25 prey families from six orders of insects in the diet of C. pumilus and 24 families from seven orders in M. condylurus.
- Most unique sequences found in the pellets were from the insect orders Lepidoptera and Diptera.
- More than 50% of the cases of multiple consumption of MOTU were between species, indicating dietary overlap.
Takeaway
Scientists studied the diets of two types of bats by looking at their poop to see what insects they ate, and found they eat a lot of the same things.
Methodology
The study used high-throughput sequencing and bioinformatic techniques to analyze the diet of two bat species by examining their faecal pellets.
Potential Biases
The reliance on a limited reference database for insect identification may introduce bias in the results.
Limitations
The study's findings may not reflect the full spectrum of prey taken by the bats due to limited sampling sites and time.
Participant Demographics
The study focused on two species of bats, Chaerephon pumilus and Mops condylurus, in Swaziland.
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
Want to read the original?
Access the complete publication on the publisher's website