Community-based Participatory Research: Necessary Next Steps
Author Information
Author(s): Faridi Zubaida MBBS, MPH, Grunbaum Jo Anne EdD, Sajor Gray Barbara MIA, Franks Adele MD, Simoes Eduardo MD, MS, MPH
Primary Institution: Yale-Griffin Prevention Research Center, Yale School of Medicine
Hypothesis
How do PRC researchers and their communities interact to develop, implement, evaluate, and disseminate the core prevention research project?
Conclusion
The qualitative assessment of CBPR projects within the PRC Program has the potential to accelerate the process of establishing competencies and resources for effective CBPR.
Supporting Evidence
- CBPR is gaining credence among public health researchers and practitioners.
- The PRC Program has integrated CBPR into its prevention research framework.
- There is a lack of standardization in assessing the quality of CBPR research methods.
Takeaway
This study looks at how researchers and communities can work together to improve health programs. It shows that when communities are involved, the programs are more likely to succeed.
Methodology
Qualitative assessment through interviews with PRC directors, principal investigators, training coordinators, and community committee chairs.
Limitations
The discussion on competencies and institutional capabilities for CBPR remains fragmented and lacks comprehensive guidance.
Want to read the original?
Access the complete publication on the publisher's website