Position and Dimensions of the Mandibular Condyle in Various Anterior–Posterior Skeletal Patterns: A CBCT Imaging Study in a Sample of Iranian People
2024

Study of Mandibular Condyle Position and Size in Different Skeletal Patterns

Sample size: 119 publication Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Vasegh Zahra, Safi Yaser, Dalaei Kazem, Hosseinzadeh Mehdi, Tayari Nasim

Primary Institution: Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

Hypothesis

The study aims to evaluate and compare the size and position of the mandibular condyle among male and female patients with different skeletal patterns using CBCT images.

Conclusion

Class I individuals have smaller posterior joint space compared to Class III individuals, while Class II individuals have shorter condyle lengths than both Class I and Class III.

Supporting Evidence

  • Class I individuals had lower PS values compared to Class III individuals.
  • Class II individuals had shorter condyle lengths compared to those in Class III and Class I.
  • Different skeletal patterns did not show a statistically significant effect on the superior space.

Takeaway

This study looked at how the shape and position of a part of the jawbone, called the condyle, can be different in people with various jaw shapes, helping doctors plan better treatments.

Methodology

The study analyzed CBCT images of 119 patients classified into three skeletal pattern groups based on ANB angles and Wits analysis.

Potential Biases

The study did not account for other potential factors, such as TMD, in the development of skeletal malocclusions.

Limitations

The unequal distribution of male and female participants across skeletal classes may affect the generalizability of the findings.

Participant Demographics

The sample consisted of 33 males and 86 females, aged 16 to 77 years, with an average age of 32.86 years.

Statistical Information

P-Value

p = 0.015 for PS size difference between Class I and Class III.

Statistical Significance

p<0.05

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1155/ijod/5895594

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication