Population tobacco control interventions and their effects on social inequalities in smoking: systematic review
2008

Effects of Tobacco Control Interventions on Smoking Inequalities

Sample size: 84 publication Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Thomas S, Fayter D, Misso K, Ogilvie D, Petticrew M, Sowden A, Whitehead M, Worthy G

Primary Institution: MRC Social and Public Health Sciences Unit, Glasgow

Hypothesis

What are the effects of population tobacco control interventions on social inequalities in smoking?

Conclusion

Population-level tobacco control interventions can help reduce health inequalities by benefiting more disadvantaged groups.

Supporting Evidence

  • Restrictions on smoking in workplaces may be more effective for higher occupational groups.
  • Smoking restrictions in schools may be more effective in girls.
  • Increasing the price of tobacco products may reduce smoking among lower-income adults.
  • Young people under 25 are affected by price increases, with boys and non-white youth being more sensitive.

Takeaway

This study looked at how different rules about smoking can help everyone, especially those who are less well off, to smoke less.

Methodology

The study included a systematic review of 84 studies assessing the effects of population-level tobacco control interventions on smoking behavior across different demographic and socioeconomic groups.

Potential Biases

Potential biases may arise from the exclusion of studies focusing solely on individual-level interventions and the reliance on self-reported data.

Limitations

The evidence base lacks prospective evaluations and often does not report co-interventions or contextual factors that might influence outcomes.

Participant Demographics

The studies included diverse populations, with outcomes reported by race, ethnicity, occupation, gender, educational level, income, and age.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1136/tc.2007.023911

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication