Subsidence and Clinical Impact of Obesity in Short-Stem Total Hip Arthroplasty Using a Collarless, Triple-Tapered, Cementless Stem
2024

Impact of Obesity on Short-Stem Total Hip Arthroplasty

Sample size: 163 publication Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Gruber Michael Stephan, Schöning Johannes, Bischofreiter Martin, Kindermann Harald, Schulz Arndt-Peter, Hinz Nico, Mayböck Emanuel, Ortmaier Reinhold

Primary Institution: Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Ordensklinikum Linz Barmherzige Schwestern, Vinzenzgruppe Center of Orthopedic Excellence, Teaching Hospital of the Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria

Hypothesis

Does obesity influence postoperative subsidence and clinical outcomes after short-stem total hip arthroplasty?

Conclusion

Obesity is associated with increased subsidence in short-stem total hip arthroplasty, especially in patients with larger planned stem sizes.

Supporting Evidence

  • The obesity group had a mean subsidence of 2.6 mm compared to 2.2 mm in the nonobesity group.
  • Regression analysis showed that planned stem size significantly correlated with subsidence (p = 0.005).
  • Clinical outcomes improved significantly in both groups, but the obesity group had lower Harris Hip Scores.

Takeaway

This study found that heavier people tend to have more problems with their hip implants sinking into the bone after surgery, especially if they have bigger implants.

Methodology

A retrospective cohort study analyzing 163 patients who underwent short-stem THA, categorized by BMI, with subsidence and clinical outcomes assessed.

Potential Biases

Potential selection bias due to uniform surgical technique and experience of surgeons.

Limitations

Single-institution study, limited BMI classification, and lack of evaluation of other confounding factors like smoking.

Participant Demographics

Patients included 86 with obesity (BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2) and 77 nonobese (BMI < 30 kg/m2), with no significant differences in age or sex.

Statistical Information

P-Value

0.015

Statistical Significance

p = 0.015

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.3390/jcm13247596

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication