Analgesia for labour pain – analysis of the trends and associations in the Grampian region of Scotland between 1986 and 2001
2006

Trends in Labour Pain Relief in Scotland (1986-2001)

Sample size: 81418 publication 10 minutes Evidence: high

Author Information

Author(s): Bhattacharya Sohinee, Wang Tao, Knox Fiona

Primary Institution: University of Aberdeen

Hypothesis

The study aimed to analyze the trends and associations of different types of labour analgesia used by women in the Grampian region of Scotland.

Conclusion

Non-epidural analgesia was the most popular choice for pain relief in labour in the Grampian region between 1986 and 2001, although an increase in the uptake of epidural services is starting to occur.

Supporting Evidence

  • 15.5% of women used epidural analgesia, while 41.5% used opioids.
  • Women receiving epidural analgesia were more likely to have pregnancy-related complications.
  • Labour was more likely to be induced in women receiving epidural analgesia.

Takeaway

Most women in Scotland chose non-epidural pain relief during childbirth from 1986 to 2001, but more are starting to use epidurals now.

Methodology

The study analyzed retrospective data from the Aberdeen Maternity and Neonatal Databank for deliveries from 1986 to 2001, comparing the use of epidural, opioid, and no analgesia.

Potential Biases

The dataset may be subject to selection bias as women with high-risk pregnancies were likely recommended epidural analgesia.

Limitations

The study could not analyze disaggregated data on the use of Entonox and no analgesia, which may limit the understanding of certain outcomes.

Participant Demographics

Women receiving epidural analgesia were generally younger, shorter, and heavier, with a higher incidence of pregnancy-related complications.

Statistical Information

P-Value

0.0005

Confidence Interval

95% CI 1.01, 1.08

Statistical Significance

p<0.01

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1186/1471-2393-6-14

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication