Increasing participation of cancer patients in randomised controlled trials: a systematic review
2006

Increasing Participation of Cancer Patients in Trials

Sample size: 8 publication Evidence: low

Author Information

Author(s): Mc Daid Catriona, Hodges ZoƩ, Fayter Debra, Stirk Lisa, Eastwood Alison

Primary Institution: Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, University of York

Hypothesis

What interventions can effectively increase cancer patient participation in randomized controlled trials?

Conclusion

There is not a strong evidence-base for interventions that increase cancer patient participation in randomized trials.

Supporting Evidence

  • Eight studies were identified that met the inclusion criteria.
  • Six studies had interventions relevant to the UK.
  • One good quality RCT found that urologists and nurses were equally effective at recruiting participants.

Takeaway

The study looked at ways to help more cancer patients join clinical trials, but found that none of the methods tested really worked.

Methodology

A systematic review of published and unpublished studies was conducted, assessing interventions aimed at improving cancer patient participation in RCTs.

Potential Biases

There was a risk of contamination between the experimental and comparison interventions.

Limitations

Most studies had methodological weaknesses and were vulnerable to selection bias.

Participant Demographics

The majority of participants were women, and most studies included individuals with different cancers.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1186/1745-6215-7-16

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication