Access to Local Resources in Glasgow by Area Deprivation
Author Information
Author(s): Sally Macintyre, Laura Macdonald, Anne Ellaway
Primary Institution: MRC Social and Public Health Sciences Unit
Hypothesis
Do poorer people have poorer access to local resources and facilities?
Conclusion
Access to resources in Glasgow does not consistently disadvantage poorer neighborhoods, as some resources are more accessible in both affluent and deprived areas.
Supporting Evidence
- 12 resources were found to be more common in deprived neighborhoods, while 16 were more common in affluent neighborhoods.
- Public nurseries and primary schools were closer to more deprived areas, while secondary schools were closer to affluent areas.
- Access to resources varied significantly by neighborhood deprivation, indicating a complex relationship.
Takeaway
This study looked at how easy it is for people in different neighborhoods of Glasgow to get to important places like schools and parks. It found that sometimes poorer areas have just as many resources as richer ones.
Methodology
The study examined the location of 42 resources in Glasgow City by deprivation quintiles, using measures such as density per 1000 population and network distance to the nearest resource.
Potential Biases
Potential biases may arise from not accounting for the perceived availability of resources versus actual access.
Limitations
The study did not measure the quality of resources, only their availability and distance.
Participant Demographics
The study focused on various neighborhoods in Glasgow, categorized by deprivation levels.
Statistical Information
P-Value
p<0.05
Statistical Significance
p<0.05
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
Want to read the original?
Access the complete publication on the publisher's website