Process factors explaining the ineffectiveness of a multidisciplinary fall prevention programme: A process evaluation
2008

Evaluating a Fall Prevention Program for Older Adults

Sample size: 166 publication Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Bleijlevens Michel HC, Hendriks Marike RC, van Haastregt Jolanda CM, van Rossum Erik, Kempen Gertrudis IJM, Diederiks Joseph PM, Crebolder Harry FJM, van Eijk Jacques ThM

Primary Institution: Maastricht University

Hypothesis

What factors explain the ineffectiveness of a multidisciplinary fall prevention programme?

Conclusion

The study found that the fall prevention programme was feasible but ineffective due to low compliance and few referrals.

Supporting Evidence

  • The programme was largely performed according to protocol.
  • Participants reported a low to moderate compliance with contacting their GP.
  • A majority of participants felt they benefited from the programme.

Takeaway

The program to help older people avoid falls was easy to use, but many didn't follow through with the advice given.

Methodology

The study used self-administered questionnaires, structured interviews, and recording forms to collect data from participants and practitioners.

Potential Biases

Social desirability bias may have affected participant and practitioner responses.

Limitations

Participants may have given socially desirable answers, and data from GPs were not collected.

Participant Demographics

Participants were community-dwelling individuals aged 65 and over who had visited the A&E department due to a fall.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1186/1471-2458-8-332

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication