Cognitive Interventions and Nutritional Supplements (CINS) Trial for Chronic Low Back Pain
Author Information
Author(s): Reme Silje E, Tveito Torill H, Chalder Trudie, Bjørkkjær Tormod, Indahl Aage, Brox Jens I, Fors Egil, Hagen Eli M, Eriksen Hege R
Primary Institution: Uni Health, Uni Research, Bergen, Norway
Hypothesis
Does adding cognitive behavioral therapy or nutritional supplements to a brief intervention improve outcomes for patients with chronic low back pain?
Conclusion
The CINS trial aims to determine the effectiveness of cognitive behavioral therapy and nutritional supplements for chronic low back pain patients.
Supporting Evidence
- Brief intervention programs are clinically beneficial and cost-effective for low back pain.
- 30% of patients with chronic low back pain do not return to work.
- European Guidelines recommend CBT but call for further research on its effectiveness.
Takeaway
This study is testing if talking therapy or special oils can help people with long-lasting back pain feel better and go back to work.
Methodology
Participants will be randomly assigned to one of four interventions: Brief Intervention, Brief Intervention plus CBT, Brief Intervention plus seal oil, or Brief Intervention plus soy oil.
Potential Biases
Potential bias may arise from the varied backgrounds of therapists and the subjective nature of self-reported outcomes.
Limitations
The study may face challenges in ensuring consistent delivery of interventions across different therapists and clinics.
Participant Demographics
Participants are chronic low back pain patients aged 20 to 60 years, sick listed for 2-10 months.
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
Want to read the original?
Access the complete publication on the publisher's website