Qualitative evaluation of a form for standardized information exchange between orthopedic surgeons and occupational physicians
2006

Evaluating a Standardized Information Exchange Form for Orthopedic Surgeons and Occupational Physicians

Sample size: 8 publication Evidence: low

Author Information

Author(s): Elske Faber, Alex Burdorf, Anne Loes van Staa, Harald S Miedema, Jan AN Verhaar

Primary Institution: Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands

Hypothesis

Does a standardized information exchange form improve communication between orthopedic surgeons and occupational physicians?

Conclusion

The information exchange form was found to be useful, but its implementation was limited due to low usage among orthopedic surgeons.

Supporting Evidence

  • The form was used for 8 patients, but only 4 transferred it to their occupational physician.
  • All orthopedic surgeons found the form useful but noted it was rarely used.
  • Patients felt the form improved communication about their treatment.

Takeaway

Doctors created a form to help share important information about patients with work-related injuries, but not many used it.

Methodology

Qualitative evaluation through structured interviews with patients and physicians.

Limitations

The form was only used for a small number of patients, limiting the ability to assess its effectiveness.

Participant Demographics

Patients primarily had knee disorders and one had non-specific low back pain.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1186/1472-6963-6-144

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication