Malaria Control Practices in Central Kenya
Author Information
Author(s): Ng'ang'a Peter N, Shililu Josephat, Jayasinghe Gayathri, Kimani Violet, Kabutha Charity, Kabuage Lucy, Kabiru Ephantus, Githure John, Mutero Clifford
Primary Institution: International Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology (ICIPE), Nairobi, Kenya
Hypothesis
What are the vector control practices applied in an irrigated rice agro-ecosystem in central Kenya and what factors affect their application?
Conclusion
The study provides relevant information necessary for the management, prevention, and control of malaria in irrigated agro-ecosystems.
Supporting Evidence
- More than 80% of respondents were aware of the major breeding sites of the malaria vector.
- 57% of respondents used treated bed nets for personal protection against mosquito bites.
- 39% of respondents could not apply known vector control methods due to unaffordability.
- Lack of time was the main reason for non-application of environmental management practices.
Takeaway
This study looked at how people in central Kenya try to control malaria and found that many know about the problem but can't always afford the best solutions.
Methodology
A cross-sectional household survey was conducted in four villages with 400 randomly sampled households using questionnaires and focus group discussions.
Potential Biases
Potential bias in self-reported data from respondents regarding their knowledge and practices.
Limitations
The study may not fully represent all communities due to its focus on specific villages.
Participant Demographics
368 households were interviewed, consisting of 34.5% males and 65.5% females, with a median age of 39 years.
Statistical Information
P-Value
0.004
Statistical Significance
p<0.05
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
Want to read the original?
Access the complete publication on the publisher's website