Phytolith Analysis for Differentiating between Foxtail Millet (Setaria italica) and Green Foxtail (Setaria viridis)
2011

Phytolith Analysis for Differentiating between Foxtail Millet and Green Foxtail

Sample size: 16 publication 10 minutes Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Zhang Jianping, Lu Houyuan, Wu Naiqin, Yang Xiaoyan, Diao Xianmin

Primary Institution: Key Laboratory of Cenozoic Geology and Environment, Institute of Geology and Geophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China

Hypothesis

Can phytolith analysis of inflorescence bracts be used as an effective tool for discriminating foxtail millet from green foxtail?

Conclusion

Phytolith morphology in upper lemmas and paleas can reliably distinguish foxtail millet from green foxtail.

Supporting Evidence

  • 78.4% of foxtail millet and 76.9% of green foxtail were correctly classified using phytolith analysis.
  • The size of ΩIII type phytolith of foxtail millet is larger than that from green foxtail.
  • Phytoliths can remain in sediments long after the living tissue has decayed, making them useful for archaeological studies.

Takeaway

Scientists studied tiny plant structures called phytoliths to tell the difference between two types of millet, which are important crops. They found that the shapes of these structures can help identify which millet is which.

Methodology

The study examined phytoliths from 9 samples of foxtail millet and 7 samples of green foxtail using light microscopy and discriminant function analysis.

Potential Biases

Potential bias due to limited sample diversity, particularly from Western Europe.

Limitations

The study may have misclassified about 25% of the data, making identification difficult when phytoliths are few.

Statistical Information

P-Value

0.000

Statistical Significance

p<0.05

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1371/journal.pone.0019726

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication