Patient Entry of Information: Evaluation of User Interfaces
2004

Evaluating User Interfaces for Patient Data Entry

Sample size: 11 publication Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Matthew I Kim, Kevin B Johnson

Primary Institution: Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine

Hypothesis

Do different types of data entry methods employed by Personal Health Records impact the accuracy of patient-entered medical information?

Conclusion

Different types of data entry methods may affect the accuracy of patient-entered medical information, with guided entry methods leading to more accurate data.

Supporting Evidence

  • Accuracy rates varied based on the complexity of the information requested.
  • Guided entry methods led to more accurate data entry compared to free text entry.
  • Participants were more likely to make spelling errors when entering information abstracted from clinic notes.

Takeaway

This study looked at how patients enter their medical information online and found that some ways of entering data are better than others for getting it right.

Methodology

Patients with thyroid disorders entered data into a web-based application using various data entry methods, and their entries were compared to confirmed medical records.

Potential Biases

Participants' familiarity with thyroid disorders may have led to an overestimation of the accuracy of data entry methods.

Limitations

The study's participants were primarily members of thyroid patient organizations, which may not represent the general population's familiarity with medical terminology.

Participant Demographics

Participants were patients with disorders requiring treatment with thyroid hormone preparations.

Statistical Information

P-Value

0.001

Statistical Significance

p<0.05

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.2196/jmir.6.2.e13

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication