The Role of Complementary and Alternative Medicine in Germany: A Focus Group Study of GPs
Author Information
Author(s): Joos Stefanie, Musselmann Berthold, Miksch Antje, Rosemann Thomas, Szecsenyi Joachim
Primary Institution: Department of General Practice and Health Services Research, University Hospital Heidelberg
Hypothesis
What are the attitudes of GPs about the role of CAM in Germany?
Conclusion
The majority of participating GPs considered CAM as a reasonable complementary approach within primary care.
Supporting Evidence
- 73% of the population in Germany had experience with CAM by 2002.
- Many GPs integrate CAM therapies into their daily practice.
- Focus groups revealed diverse opinions on the role of CAM in healthcare.
- Quality control in CAM is a contentious issue among GPs.
- GPs expressed a need for better education and funding for CAM research.
Takeaway
Most doctors in Germany think that alternative medicine can help patients, but they want to be paid fairly for the time they spend with patients.
Methodology
Qualitative approach using focus groups with 17 GPs, analyzed through qualitative content analysis.
Potential Biases
The authors' involvement in CAM may influence the analysis.
Limitations
The sample was a convenience sample, which may not represent all GPs' views on CAM.
Participant Demographics
{"gender":{"female":9,"male":8},"years_of_work_in_practice":{"average":7.6,"range":"0.5 to 15"},"structure_of_practice":{"single_practice":7,"group_practice":8,"practice_sharing":2},"location_of_practice":{"city":12,"rural":5},"qualifications":{"naturopathy":14,"chiropractic":4,"homeopathy":5,"balneology":1,"acupuncture_certificate":4}}
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
Want to read the original?
Access the complete publication on the publisher's website