eGenomics: Cataloguing Our Complete Genome Collection
Author Information
Author(s): Dawn Field, George Garrity, Norman Morrison, Jeremy Selengut, Peter Sterk, Tatiana Tatusova, Nick Thomson
Primary Institution: Oxford Centre for Ecology and Hydrology
Hypothesis
The scientific community would benefit from a new standard to capture a richer set of information describing complete genomes.
Conclusion
The workshop concluded that a new genomic standard should evolve to improve metadata capture and exchange.
Supporting Evidence
- The workshop aimed to develop a checklist for genomic metadata.
- Community-driven standards have the best chance of success.
- Participants discussed the need for harmonizing metadata capture efforts.
- An open call for community involvement was made to refine the checklist.
Takeaway
Scientists want to create a better way to share information about genomes so that everyone can understand them better.
Methodology
The workshop included discussions among biologists, computer scientists, and database builders to identify needs for metadata standards.
Limitations
The workshop's outcomes depend on community involvement and funding for future efforts.
Participant Demographics
Participants included biologists, computer scientists, and genomic database builders.
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
Want to read the original?
Access the complete publication on the publisher's website