Performance in the MRCP(UK) Examination 2003–4: analysis of pass rates of UK graduates in relation to self-declared ethnicity and gender
2007

Analysis of MRCP(UK) Examination Pass Rates by Ethnicity and Gender

Sample size: 3650 publication 10 minutes Evidence: high

Author Information

Author(s): Dewhurst Neil G, McManus Chris, Mollon Jennifer, Dacre Jane E, Vale Allister J

Primary Institution: MRCP(UK) Central Office, University College London

Hypothesis

Does ethnicity and gender affect pass rates in the MRCP(UK) Examination for UK medical graduates?

Conclusion

White candidates achieved the highest pass rates across all parts of the MRCP(UK) Examination, while non-white male trainees performed particularly poorly.

Supporting Evidence

  • White candidates performed better than other ethnic groups in all parts of the examination.
  • Women performed better than men in the Part 2 Clinical Examination (PACES).
  • Non-white men performed more poorly than expected compared to white men or non-white women.
  • Significant interaction between candidate and examiner ethnicity was found for communication skills performance.

Takeaway

This study looked at how different groups of medical students did on a big test, finding that white students did better than others, especially in communication skills.

Methodology

Pass rates were analyzed based on self-declared ethnicity and gender using statistical methods including Chi-squared tests and logistic regression.

Potential Biases

Potential examiner bias was noted, particularly in communication skills assessments when non-white examiners evaluated non-white candidates.

Limitations

The study did not collect data on place of birth or first language, which could influence outcomes.

Participant Demographics

Participants included UK medical graduates, with 84-90% declaring their ethnicity and all declaring their gender.

Statistical Information

P-Value

p<0.001

Confidence Interval

95% CI 48.6–52.0%

Statistical Significance

p<0.001

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1186/1741-7015-5-8

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication