Toxicology and Nanoscience: Understanding Disciplinary Identities
Author Information
Author(s): Monika Kurath, Sabine Maasen
Primary Institution: Science Studies, University of Basel & Collegium Helveticum, ETH and University of Zurich
Hypothesis
How does the entry into the field of nanosciences impact the formation of disciplinary identities in toxicology?
Conclusion
Toxicology is currently in a transitional phase as it navigates its identity within the emerging field of nanosciences.
Supporting Evidence
- Toxicology is adapting to new challenges posed by nanosciences.
- Different approaches to toxicology's identity are being discussed among researchers.
- Funding opportunities for nanotoxicology are more favorable than for traditional toxicology.
Takeaway
This study looks at how toxicology is changing as it starts to study tiny particles called nanoparticles, which can affect health.
Methodology
Qualitative interviews with particle toxicologists in Germany, Holland, Switzerland, and the USA.
Potential Biases
Potential bias in participant selection and responses may affect the findings.
Limitations
The study relies on qualitative data from a limited number of interviews, which may not represent all perspectives in the field.
Participant Demographics
Participants included leading scientists from Germany, Holland, Switzerland, and the USA.
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
Want to read the original?
Access the complete publication on the publisher's website