Violence risk prediction in mental health inpatient settings using the Dynamic Appraisal of Situational Aggression
2024

Predicting Violence Risk in Mental Health Inpatients

Sample size: 3819 publication Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Moscovici Mario, Farrokhi Farhat, Vangala Lavanya, Simpson Alexander I. F., Kurdyak Paul, Jones Roland M.

Primary Institution: Centre for Addiction and Mental Health

Hypothesis

Different clinical settings may benefit from different cut-off scores for the Dynamic Appraisal of Situational Aggression (DASA).

Conclusion

The DASA is a moderately good predictor of violent incidents in inpatient psychiatric settings, with proposed new risk categories that may improve its clinical utility.

Supporting Evidence

  • 17% of patients had at least one violent incident during the study.
  • 88,124 DASA scores were analyzed, showing a significant association with violence.
  • 82% of violent incidents occurred within the first two weeks of admission.
  • The AUC for DASA scores was 0.73, indicating moderate predictive validity.

Takeaway

This study looked at how well a tool called DASA can predict if patients in mental health hospitals might become violent. It found that the tool works pretty well, especially if we use new ways to categorize risk.

Methodology

The study included all consecutive mental health hospital admissions from 2016 to 2019, analyzing DASA scores and violent incidents using time-to-event analysis and Receiver Operating Characteristics.

Potential Biases

The retrospective nature of the study may introduce biases related to the reliability of DASA scores recorded by staff.

Limitations

The study only included the first violent incident and did not assess clinical interventions applied to high-risk patients, which may underestimate the association between DASA scores and violence.

Participant Demographics

The mean age of participants was 39.5 years, with approximately two-thirds male; over half had a diagnosis of schizophrenia spectrum or psychotic disorder.

Statistical Information

P-Value

p<0.001

Confidence Interval

HR 1.79 (95% CI 1.73-1.85)

Statistical Significance

p<0.001

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1460332

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication