Early Diagnosis of Periodontitis Using Clinical and Radiographic Parameters
Author Information
Author(s): Fidyawati Desy, Masulili Sri Lelyati C., Iskandar Hanna Bachtiar, Suhartanto Heru, Kiswanjaya Bramma, Li Xue
Primary Institution: Universitas Indonesia
Hypothesis
The two diagnostic categories of clinical examination and periapical radiographs are not associated with the onset of early periodontitis.
Conclusion
The study emphasizes the importance of both clinical and radiographic assessments in diagnosing early periodontitis, though integrating these findings can be complex.
Supporting Evidence
- 97% of cases with bleeding on probing indicated early periodontitis.
- Pocket depth was the most significant factor in diagnosing early periodontitis.
- 60% of cases showed early periodontitis through radiographic examination.
Takeaway
Doctors can use both physical exams and X-rays to find early signs of gum disease, but it's tricky to get it just right.
Methodology
This cross-sectional study involved 21 participants aged 20–30 with clinical signs of periodontitis and radiographic evidence of alveolar bone changes.
Potential Biases
Variations in clinical examination techniques and radiographic interpretation may introduce bias.
Limitations
The study's sample size was limited, and the accuracy of clinical examinations can be subjective.
Participant Demographics
Participants were aged 20–30 with clinical signs of periodontitis.
Statistical Information
P-Value
0.000
Statistical Significance
p<0.05
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
Want to read the original?
Access the complete publication on the publisher's website