Multidisciplinary care planning in the primary care management of completed stroke: a systematic review
2008

Multidisciplinary Care Planning for Stroke Management

Sample size: 18 publication Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Mitchell Geoffrey K, Brown Robyn M, Erikssen Lars, Tieman Jennifer J

Primary Institution: University of Queensland

Hypothesis

Does coordinated multidisciplinary care planning involving primary care professionals improve outcomes in patients with completed stroke compared to usual care?

Conclusion

Multidisciplinary care planning may not significantly improve care for stroke patients, but it could offer process benefits like better task allocation among providers.

Supporting Evidence

  • One thousand and forty-five citations were retrieved, with eighteen papers included for analysis.
  • Mortality rates were not impacted by multidisciplinary care planning.
  • Functional outcomes varied across studies, indicating inconsistent results.

Takeaway

This study looked at how different health professionals work together to help stroke patients. It found that while teamwork might not always make patients better, it can help organize care better.

Methodology

A systematic review of various studies including randomized trials, observational studies, and qualitative research on multidisciplinary care for stroke patients.

Potential Biases

Assumptions about primary care roles may not reflect actual practices, leading to potential biases in understanding care effectiveness.

Limitations

The studies included were heterogeneous, making it difficult to draw clear conclusions, and some relevant literature may have been missed.

Participant Demographics

Adults with completed stroke, specific demographics not detailed.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1186/1471-2296-9-44

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication