Association testing by haplotype-sharing methods applicable to whole-genome analysis
2007

New Methods for Identifying Disease Genes

Sample size: 920 publication Evidence: high

Author Information

Author(s): Nolte Ilja M, Vries André R, Spijker Geert T, Jansen Ritsert C, Brinza Dumitru, Zelikovsky Alexander, te Meerman Gerard J

Primary Institution: University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen

Hypothesis

There is a difference in haplotype patterns between cases and controls at regions associated with the disease.

Conclusion

Haplotype sharing methods, particularly the CROSS test, show great promise for identifying disease gene loci.

Supporting Evidence

  • The CROSS test detected a significant association at approximately position 4407 kb.
  • The CROSS test outperformed conventional methods with respect to significance level and signal-to-noise ratio.
  • A 20-kb candidate region could be identified.
  • Both the HSS and the CROSS showed better fine-mapping accuracy than straightforward haplotype association.

Takeaway

Scientists created new ways to find genes that cause diseases by looking at shared DNA patterns in sick and healthy people.

Methodology

The study analyzed data sets from the North American Rheumatoid Arthritis Consortium and simulated data, using haplotype-sharing methods to compare cases and controls.

Limitations

The robustness of the methods to haplotype reconstruction errors or missing alleles was not investigated.

Participant Demographics

460 cases and 460 controls from a New York City population.

Statistical Information

P-Value

p<0.05

Confidence Interval

1.16–1.72

Statistical Significance

p<0.05

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication