Variabilities and contentions in anesthesiologists’ perspectives on Japanese perianesthesia nurses: a qualitative study
2024

Anesthesiologists' Views on Perianesthesia Nurses in Japan

Sample size: 24 publication 10 minutes Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Tamai Mikiko, Kojima Shogo, Baba Yasuko, Kurahashi Kiyoyasu

Primary Institution: International University of Health and Welfare

Hypothesis

What are the perspectives of anesthesiologists on perianesthesia nurses and the PAN system in Japan?

Conclusion

Japanese anesthesiologists have diverse perspectives on perianesthesia nurses, highlighting both their value and the challenges in the PAN system.

Supporting Evidence

  • Anesthesiologists expressed concerns about the legal status of PANs in anesthesia management.
  • Participants highlighted the importance of effective collaboration between anesthesiologists and PANs.
  • Conflicting views on the role of PANs in anesthesia management were noted among anesthesiologists.
  • Anesthesiologists recognized the need for a clear understanding of PAN roles to improve patient care.

Takeaway

This study shows that anesthesiologists in Japan think differently about the role of nurses who help with anesthesia, and they have some concerns about how this system works.

Methodology

Qualitative interviews were conducted with 24 anesthesiologists, and data were analyzed using the framework method.

Potential Biases

Potential bias from the primary researcher's background in anesthesiology may influence data interpretation.

Limitations

The study may not fully represent the views of less experienced anesthesiologists, as most participants were senior staff.

Participant Demographics

Participants included 24 anesthesiologists from various hospitals in Japan, with a gender distribution of 75% male and 25% female.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1371/journal.pone.0313158

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication