Comparative supragenomic analyses among the pathogens Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus pneumoniae, and Haemophilus influenzae Using a modification of the finite supragenome model
2011

Comparative Analysis of Staphylococcus aureus and Other Pathogens

Sample size: 17 publication Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Boissy Robert, Ahmed Azad, Janto Benjamin, Earl Josh, Hall Barry G, Hogg Justin S, Pusch Gordon D, Hiller Luisa N, Powell Evan, Hayes Jay, Yu Susan, Kathju Sandeep, Stoodley Paul, Post J Christopher, Ehrlich Garth D, Hu Fen Z

Primary Institution: Center for Genomic Sciences, Allegheny-Singer Research Institute

Hypothesis

The study aims to analyze the gene content differences among various strains of Staphylococcus aureus and compare it with other pathogens.

Conclusion

The study reveals that Staphylococcus aureus has a relatively larger core genome compared to other opportunistic pathogens.

Supporting Evidence

  • The study sequenced three clinical strains and combined these data with 13 publicly available human isolates.
  • Gene clustering yielded 3,155 orthologous gene clusters, with 2,266 identified as core genes.
  • The mean difference in gene content among S. aureus strains was 296 genes.

Takeaway

Researchers looked at the genes of different Staphylococcus aureus strains to see how they differ, and found that some strains have more important genes than others.

Methodology

The study used whole genome sequencing and a revised finite supragenome model to analyze gene content across 17 strains of Staphylococcus aureus.

Potential Biases

Selection bias may occur due to the focus on clinically relevant strains rather than a broader representation of the species.

Limitations

The study may not represent all strains of Staphylococcus aureus, as it focused on a limited number of clinical isolates.

Participant Demographics

16 out of 17 strains were of human origin, with one strain from livestock.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1186/1471-2164-12-187

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication