Prognostic Impacts of Angiopoietins in NSCLC Tumor Cells and Stroma: VEGF-A Impact Is Strongly Associated with Ang-2 Angiopoietins and Prognosis in NSCLC
2011

Prognostic Impacts of Angiopoietins in NSCLC Tumor Cells and Stroma

Sample size: 335 publication 10 minutes Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Sigve Andersen, Tom Donnem, Khalid Al-Shibli, Samer Al-Saad, Helge Stenvold, Lill-Tove Busund, Roy M. Bremnes, Marianne Koritzinsky

Primary Institution: Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Tromso, Tromso, Norway

Hypothesis

This study evaluates the prognostic impact of all known human angiopoietins and their relation to the prognostic expression of VEGF-A.

Conclusion

Only the expression of the angiopoietin Ang-4 in tumor cells had an impact on NSCLC survival, while Ang-2 and Ang-4 expression in stroma were independently associated with improved survival.

Supporting Evidence

  • Low tumor cell expression of Ang-4 was associated with poor survival.
  • Low stromal expressions of Ang-4 and Ang-2 were independently associated with poor prognosis.
  • High tumor cell expression of VEGF-A was a poor prognosticator in patients with high Ang-2 expression.

Takeaway

This study looked at how certain proteins in lung cancer cells and surrounding tissue can help predict how well patients will do. It found that one protein, Ang-4, is important for survival.

Methodology

335 unselected stage I-IIIA NSCLC patients were included, and tissue samples were collected in tissue microarrays. Immunohistochemistry was used to evaluate the expression of markers.

Potential Biases

Potential biases may arise from the retrospective nature of the study and the selection criteria for included patients.

Limitations

The study is retrospective and may have selection bias due to the exclusion of patients with inadequate tissue samples or prior treatments.

Participant Demographics

Median age was 67 years, 76% were male, and 95% were current or former smokers.

Statistical Information

P-Value

p<0.001

Confidence Interval

95% CI 1.02–2.11

Statistical Significance

p<0.05

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1371/journal.pone.0019773

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication