The Chilling Effect: How Do Researchers React to Controversy?
Author Information
Author(s): Joanna Kempner
Primary Institution: Rutgers University
Hypothesis
Can political controversy have a 'chilling effect' on the production of new science?
Conclusion
Political controversies can shape what scientists choose to study, leading to self-censorship.
Supporting Evidence
- About half of the scientists reported removing controversial words from their grant applications.
- One-fourth of the respondents said the controversy made them more likely to seek funding outside of the NIH.
- Four researchers made significant career changes due to the controversy.
Takeaway
When scientists face political controversy, they sometimes stop studying certain topics or change their research to avoid trouble.
Methodology
The study used interviews with 30 principal investigators and a survey of 82 respondents to assess their reactions to a political controversy regarding NIH grants.
Potential Biases
Participants may not accurately report their experiences due to recall bias or fear of political retribution.
Limitations
The findings may not be generalizable to other areas of research and could be affected by selection bias.
Participant Demographics
The sample included principal investigators from various academic and research institutions, with a mix of junior and senior faculty.
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
Want to read the original?
Access the complete publication on the publisher's website