Gender bias revisited: new insights on the differential management of chest pain
2011

Gender Differences in Chest Pain Management

Sample size: 1212 publication 10 minutes Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Bösner Stefan, Haasenritter Jörg, Hani Maren Abu, Keller Heidi, Sönnichsen Andreas C, Karatolios Konstantinos, Schaefer Juergen R, Baum Erika, Donner-Banzhoff Norbert

Primary Institution: Department of General Practice/Family Medicine, University of Marburg

Hypothesis

Are there gender differences in the management of chest pain by general practitioners?

Conclusion

Gender differences in management decisions for chest pain patients exist, but they do not lead to suboptimal care for women.

Supporting Evidence

  • Men were referred for exercise tests more often than women (7.3% vs 4.1%).
  • Men were admitted to the hospital more frequently than women (6.6% vs 2.9%).
  • Gender differences in management ceased to exist after adjusting for typicality of chest pain.

Takeaway

Doctors treat men and women differently when they have chest pain, but this doesn't mean women get worse care.

Methodology

A prospective study involving 1212 chest pain patients across 74 primary care offices in Germany.

Potential Biases

Potential bias in GPs' assumptions about gender and CHD likelihood.

Limitations

Some findings are based on small numbers, and the Marburg CHD score may not fully capture typicality of chest pain.

Participant Demographics

Participants included 534 men and 678 women, with a mean age of 49 years for GPs.

Statistical Information

P-Value

p = 0.02 for exercise test, p < 0.01 for hospital admission

Confidence Interval

95% CI for various odds ratios reported

Statistical Significance

p<0.01

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1186/1471-2296-12-45

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication