Are Costs of Robot-Assisted Surgery Warranted for Gynecological Procedures?
Author Information
Author(s): Peter van Dam, Jan Hauspy, Luc Verkinderen, Trinh Xuan Bich, Pieter-Jan van Dam, Luc Van Looy, Luc Dirix
Primary Institution: Sint Augustinus Hospital
Hypothesis
Is the cost of robotic surgery justified compared to traditional surgical methods?
Conclusion
Robot-assisted surgery is generally more expensive than laparoscopic and open surgery, with no major consistent differences in short-term outcomes.
Supporting Evidence
- Robotic surgery is consistently more expensive than video-laparoscopy and often more than open surgery.
- The average additional variable cost for gynecological procedures was about 1600 USD.
- Robotic surgery has less short-term morbidity and blood loss compared to open surgery.
- Most robotic and laparoscopic procedures have similar short-term outcomes.
- Robotic surgery is only competitive in costs for very complex surgical procedures.
Takeaway
Robotic surgery costs more than regular surgery, but it doesn't always mean it's better. It's like having a fancy toy that doesn't always work better than the simpler ones.
Methodology
The study is a systematic review of the literature on the costs and outcomes of robotic surgery for gynecological procedures.
Potential Biases
The exponential use of robotic surgery is driven by manufacturers and patient demand rather than evidence-based benefits.
Limitations
There is a lack of comparative data on long-term morbidity and oncologic outcomes after robotic, laparoscopic, and open surgeries.
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
Want to read the original?
Access the complete publication on the publisher's website