SENSITIVITY OF FALL RISK CUTOFFS USING LAB AND REMOTE MEASURES ON OLDER PROSTATE CANCER SURVIVORS
2024

Fall Risk in Older Prostate Cancer Survivors

Sample size: 243 publication

Author Information

Author(s): Guidarelli Carolyn, Stoyles Sydnee, Dieckmann Nathan, Sokolova Alexandra, Graff Julie, Roeland Eric, Winters-Stone Kerri

Primary Institution: Oregon Health & Science University

Hypothesis

Traditional fall risk cutoff scores may not accurately classify faller status in older prostate cancer survivors treated with androgen deprivation therapy.

Conclusion

Traditional fall risk cutoff scores do not accurately classify faller status in prostate cancer survivors exposed to androgen deprivation therapy.

Supporting Evidence

  • 37.9% of participants reported a fall within the last year.
  • Each test had similar sensitivity and specificity with AUCs around 56%.

Takeaway

This study looked at older men who survived prostate cancer and found that the usual ways to check if they might fall don't work well for them.

Methodology

The study used baseline data from the GET FIT Prostate trial, capturing fall history and conducting lab and remote assessments of various physical performance tests.

Potential Biases

The study does not mention any risks of bias.

Limitations

The study does not provide specific limitations.

Participant Demographics

Older prostate cancer survivors with a mean age of 74.5 years.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1093/geroni/igae098.2613

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication