Validity of the Satisfaction with Cancer Information Profile for Head and Neck Cancer Patients
Author Information
Author(s): Hankins Matthew C, Llewellyn Carrie D
Primary Institution: Brighton & Sussex Medical School
Hypothesis
Is the Satisfaction with Cancer Information Profile (SCIP) valid for tailoring information for patients with head and neck cancer?
Conclusion
The SCIP-A is a valid measure for tailoring treatment information, while SCIP-B is less useful for item-level tailoring due to uniform satisfaction responses.
Supporting Evidence
- The SCIP-A showed good discrimination at the total satisfaction level.
- Principal components analysis revealed a coherent three-factor solution for SCIP-A.
- The SCIP-B was determined to be one-dimensional and suitable for total satisfaction assessment.
Takeaway
The SCIP helps doctors understand what information cancer patients need, so they can give them the right details about their treatment.
Methodology
The study used principal components analysis to assess the discrimination of SCIP-A and SCIP-B in a sample of newly diagnosed head and neck cancer patients.
Limitations
The financial support subscale had low reliability due to a small number of items.
Participant Demographics
The sample was predominantly white (92%) and male (66%), with a mean age of 60 years.
Statistical Information
P-Value
p<0.001
Statistical Significance
p<0.001
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
Want to read the original?
Access the complete publication on the publisher's website