Reduced Oxidative Susceptibility of Lp(a) and LDL Fractions as a Pleiotropic Effect of Lipoprotein Apheresis in Patients with Elevated Lp(a) and ASCVDs
2024

Reduced Oxidative Susceptibility of Lp(a) and LDL Fractions from Lipoprotein Apheresis

Sample size: 43 publication 10 minutes Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Krzesińska Aleksandra, Marlęga-Linert Joanna, Chyła-Danił Gabriela, Marcinkowska Marta, Rogowska Paulina, Stumska Katarzyna, Fijałkowski Marcin, Gruchała Marcin, Jankowski Maciej, Mickiewicz Agnieszka, Kuchta Agnieszka, Fujiwara Yasuyuki

Primary Institution: Medical University of Gdańsk

Hypothesis

Does lipoprotein apheresis alter the susceptibility of lipoprotein(a) to oxidative modifications?

Conclusion

Lipoprotein apheresis reduces the oxidative susceptibility of Lp(a) and LDL particles, potentially lowering cardiovascular disease risk.

Supporting Evidence

  • Lipoprotein apheresis significantly reduced Lp(a) levels by 62% and LDL-C by 48%.
  • Oxidation lag time for Lp(a) increased by 49% after apheresis.
  • The slope of the oxidation curve decreased by 52% for Lp(a) after the procedure.
  • Patients showed a significant correlation between autotaxin activity and oxidation susceptibility parameters.
  • All analyzed values returned to baseline 7 days after the procedure.

Takeaway

This study shows that a procedure called lipoprotein apheresis can make certain bad fats in the blood less likely to cause problems, which might help keep hearts healthy.

Methodology

Patients with high Lp(a) levels underwent lipoprotein apheresis, and lipoprotein fractions were analyzed for oxidative susceptibility before, immediately after, and 7 days after the procedure.

Limitations

The study had a relatively small sample size, which may limit the generalizability of the findings.

Participant Demographics

43 patients aged 31-82 years, with 24 undergoing lipoprotein apheresis and 19 not undergoing it.

Statistical Information

P-Value

p<0.001

Statistical Significance

p<0.05

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.3390/ijms252413597

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication