Drug-Resistant Genotypes and Multi-Clonality in Plasmodium falciparum Analysed by Direct Genome Sequencing from Peripheral Blood of Malaria Patients
2011

Genome Sequencing of Malaria Parasites from Patients

Sample size: 4 publication 10 minutes Evidence: high

Author Information

Author(s): Timothy Robinson, Susana G. Campino, Sarah Auburn, Samuel A. Assefa, Spencer D. Polley, Magnus Manske, Bronwyn MacInnis, Kirk A. Rockett, Gareth L. Maslen, Mandy Sanders, Michael A. Quail, Peter L. Chiodini, Dominic P. Kwiatkowski, Taane G. Clark, Colin J. Sutherland

Primary Institution: Wellcome Trust Centre for Human Genetics, University of Oxford

Hypothesis

Can next-generation sequencing provide insights into the genetic diversity and drug resistance of Plasmodium falciparum in malaria patients?

Conclusion

Genome sequencing of malaria parasites directly from patients reveals high clonal multiplicity and identifies both known and novel genetic variations associated with drug resistance.

Supporting Evidence

  • Each patient harbored at least 3 clones of P. falciparum, consistent with conventional PCR analysis.
  • Genome sequencing provided high-quality data useful for drug resistance studies.
  • Novel gene deletions and amplifications were identified in the parasite genomes.
  • Full mitochondrial genomes were extracted and compared against a panel of polymorphic sites.

Takeaway

Scientists studied blood samples from malaria patients to see how many different types of the malaria parasite were present and if they could resist treatment. They found many different types in each patient.

Methodology

Next-generation sequencing was used to analyze genome data from five non-propagated parasite isolates taken directly from four malaria patients.

Limitations

The study was limited to a small number of patients and may not represent the full diversity of Plasmodium falciparum.

Participant Demographics

Patients included individuals from Ghana, Zimbabwe, and Kenya, with varying ages and backgrounds.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1371/journal.pone.0023204

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication