Vascular Protection by Angiotensin Receptor Antagonism Involves Differential VEGF Expression in Both Hemispheres after Experimental Stroke
2011

Vascular Protection by Angiotensin Receptor Antagonism Involves Differential VEGF Expression in Both Hemispheres after Experimental Stroke

Sample size: 60 publication Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Guan Weihua, Somanath Payaningal R., Kozak Anna, Goc Anna, El-Remessy Azza B., Ergul Adviye, Johnson Maribeth H., Alhusban Ahmed, Soliman Sahar, Fagan Susan C.

Primary Institution: University of Georgia College of Pharmacy

Hypothesis

Candesartan, an angiotensin receptor antagonist, enhances neurovascular protection and promotes a proangiogenic state after ischemic stroke.

Conclusion

Candesartan treatment leads to increased vascular density and differential expression of VEGF isoforms in both hemispheres, contributing to recovery after stroke.

Supporting Evidence

  • Candesartan significantly increased VEGFB protein in the cerebrospinal fluid after stroke.
  • Candesartan treatment resulted in a significant increase in vascular density in the nonischemic hemisphere.
  • VEGFA expression was significantly higher in the ischemic hemisphere of saline-treated animals compared to the nonischemic hemisphere.

Takeaway

This study shows that a medicine called candesartan helps protect the brain and improve recovery after a stroke by changing how certain proteins work in the brain.

Methodology

The study used a rat model with middle cerebral artery occlusion to assess the effects of candesartan on VEGF expression and vascular density.

Potential Biases

Potential bias due to funding from Astra-Zeneca, which provided the candesartan used in the study.

Limitations

The study may have lacked sufficient statistical power due to a small number of animals in some analyses.

Participant Demographics

Sixty adult male Wistar rats, weighing between 270 and 300 g.

Statistical Information

P-Value

p<0.01

Statistical Significance

p<0.05

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1371/journal.pone.0024551

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication