MicroRNA-196a & microRNA-101 expression in Barrett's oesophagus in patients with medically and surgically treated gastro-oesophageal reflux
2011

MicroRNA Expression in Barrett's Oesophagus

Sample size: 39 publication Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Haiart Sebastien, Watson David I, Leong Mary P, Astill David, Bright Tim, Hussey Damian J

Primary Institution: Flinders University, Flinders Medical Centre

Hypothesis

Two miRNAs with inflammatory and oncogenic roles, miR-101 and miR-196a, are differentially expressed in Barrett's oesophagus epithelium in patients with reflux treated medically vs. surgically.

Conclusion

The method of reflux treatment did not influence the expression of miR-101 and miR-196a in Barrett's oesophagus.

Supporting Evidence

  • No significant differences in miR-101 and miR-196a expression in Barrett's oesophagus epithelium in patients treated by PPI vs. fundoplication.
  • Secondary analysis showed a correlation between miR-196a expression and Barrett's oesophagus segment length.

Takeaway

Doctors looked at tiny pieces of tissue from patients with Barrett's oesophagus to see if two specific molecules were different based on how they treated their reflux, but they found no differences.

Methodology

Mucosal tissue was obtained at endoscopy from patients, RNA was extracted, and the expression of miR-101 and miR-196a was measured using real-time reverse transcription - polymerase chain reaction.

Potential Biases

Selection bias based on age may have influenced outcomes.

Limitations

There was a significant difference in age between the two reflux treatment groups, and no reference control tissues were included.

Participant Demographics

20 patients treated with PPI and 19 patients treated with fundoplication.

Statistical Information

P-Value

0.0039 for age difference, 0.014 for miR-196a correlation with Barrett's length

Confidence Interval

95% confidence intervals provided for various measurements.

Statistical Significance

p=0.768 and 0.211

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1186/1756-0500-4-41

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication