Improving How Caregivers of People Living With Dementia Are Identified in the Electronic Health Record: Qualitative Study and Exploratory Chart Review
2024

Improving Identification of Caregivers for Dementia Patients in Electronic Health Records

Sample size: 22 publication Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Ariel R Green, Cynthia M Boyd, Rosalphie Quiles Rosado, Andreas E Daddato, Kathy S Gleason, Tobie E Taylor McPhail, Marcela D Blinka, Nancy L Schoenborn, Jennifer L Wolff, Elizabeth A Bayliss, Rebecca S Boxer

Primary Institution: Johns Hopkins University

Hypothesis

How can health systems better identify and support caregivers of people living with dementia through electronic health records?

Conclusion

Caregivers of people with dementia are often not systematically identified in electronic health records, leading to inconsistent documentation of their roles and needs.

Supporting Evidence

  • Caregivers were usually identified in the contact information tab of the EHR.
  • Most caregivers reported that the people with dementia had additional caregivers.
  • Caregivers' roles and needs are often not documented systematically in the EHR.

Takeaway

This study shows that many people with dementia have multiple caregivers, but their information is often not recorded properly in health records, making it hard for doctors to know who to contact for help.

Methodology

The study involved a chart review and semi-structured interviews with caregivers and clinical staff from two health systems.

Potential Biases

Participants may have been more engaged and identified in the EHR, potentially skewing results.

Limitations

The small sample size from only two health systems may limit generalizability, and the study did not include paid caregivers.

Participant Demographics

{"people_with_dementia":{"mean_age":84.1,"sex_distribution":{"male":68,"female":32},"race_distribution":{"white":68,"black_or_african_american":23,"other":9}},"caregivers":{"mean_age":63,"sex_distribution":{"female":96,"male":5},"race_distribution":{"white":73,"black_or_african_american":23,"other":5}}}

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.2196/59584

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication