Testing a New Device for Heart Patients
Author Information
Author(s): Crittenden Jennifer, Longley Hannah, Lanba Asheesh, Kohli Amarpreet, Kumthekar Nihar, Inger Jacob, Hadsell Killian
Primary Institution: University of Maine
Hypothesis
Can a novel mock LVAD device improve response times and accessibility for older adults?
Conclusion
The study found that older and younger participants had similar reaction times to device alarms after training, highlighting the importance of device accessibility.
Supporting Evidence
- The study involved a pre-clinical trial feasibility study of a novel, non-invasive, mock LVAD device.
- Participants experienced random device alarms similar to those provided by an LVAD device.
- Qualitative findings highlighted the importance of accessible device design for older adults.
- Older and younger participants showed equivalent reaction times to device alarms after training.
Takeaway
This study tested a new heart device with people of different ages to see how quickly they could respond to alarms, and it showed that older people can learn to use it just as well as younger people.
Methodology
Participants wore a mock LVAD device for three to five days, and their responses to alarms were recorded and analyzed.
Limitations
The study's sample size was small and only included a limited age range in Phase I.
Participant Demographics
Participants included adults under 65 and older adults aged 65-90.
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
Want to read the original?
Access the complete publication on the publisher's website