Identifying strategies to improve access to credible and relevant information for public health professionals: a qualitative study
2006

Improving Access to Public Health Information

Sample size: 19 publication Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): LaPelle Nancy R, Luckmann Roger, Simpson E Hatheway, Martin Elaine R

Primary Institution: University of Massachusetts Medical School

Hypothesis

Public health practitioners have unmet information needs that could be addressed through improved access to credible information.

Conclusion

Many critical information needs of public health practitioners are not being met efficiently or at all.

Supporting Evidence

  • Public health professionals have diverse information needs that are often unmet.
  • Participants expressed a need for a single portal for accessing health information.
  • Improved access to grey literature and systematic reviews was highlighted as essential.
  • Many public health workers prefer enhancements to existing systems like PubMed.

Takeaway

Public health workers need better ways to find important health information, and this study shows how they can get it more easily.

Methodology

Qualitative methods including individual interviews and focus groups were used to gather data from public health professionals.

Potential Biases

The study may be biased towards public health workers with a strong interest in information access.

Limitations

The study's findings may not be generalizable to all public health practitioners due to the broad nature of the field.

Participant Demographics

Participants included public health professionals from various disciplines, including communicable disease control and community health promotion.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1186/1471-2458-6-89

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication