The Nature Index: A General Framework for Synthesizing Knowledge on the State of Biodiversity
2011

The Nature Index: A Framework for Understanding Biodiversity

Sample size: 430 publication 10 minutes Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Certain Grégoire, Skarpaas Olav, Bjerke Jarle-Werner, Framstad Erik, Lindholm Markus, Nilsen Jan-Erik, Norderhaug Ann, Oug Eivind, Pedersen Hans-Christian, Schartau Ann-Kristin, van der Meeren Gro I., Aslaksen Iulie, Engen Steinar, Garnåsjordet Per-Arild, Kvaløy Pål, Lillegård Magnar, Yoccoz Nigel G., Nybø Signe

Primary Institution: Norwegian Institute for Nature Research (NINA)

Hypothesis

The Nature Index framework aims to provide an integrated monitoring tool for biodiversity measurement.

Conclusion

The Nature Index framework is an efficient approach for gathering and synthesizing scientific knowledge on biodiversity.

Supporting Evidence

  • The Nature Index framework synthesizes scientific information from diverse sources.
  • It provides a transparent form to improve accessibility for environmental managers.
  • The framework allows for the comparison and traceability of information from any ecosystem type.
  • Statistical testing for differences in space or time can be implemented using Monte-Carlo simulations.
  • The results suggest that the framework has general applicability worldwide.

Takeaway

The Nature Index helps us understand how healthy our ecosystems are by using different indicators to measure biodiversity.

Methodology

The study involved collecting data from a network of experts and synthesizing it into a framework for biodiversity assessment.

Potential Biases

Expert-based estimates can be biased compared to empirical data.

Limitations

The reliance on expert judgment may introduce bias and uncertainty in the data.

Participant Demographics

Experts from various ecological fields contributed to the indicator selection.

Statistical Information

P-Value

p<0.05

Confidence Interval

0.41–0.46

Statistical Significance

p<0.05

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1371/journal.pone.0018930

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication