Comparing 3D and 2D Imaging for Heart Scarring
Author Information
Author(s): Goetti Robert, Kozerke Sebastian, Donati Olivio F, Stolzmann Paul, Corti Roberto, Manka Robert
Primary Institution: University Hospital Zurich
Hypothesis
Is a 3D imaging technique for late gadolinium enhancement better than a 2D technique for assessing myocardial scar mass and transmurality?
Conclusion
3D LGE imaging allows for accurate evaluation of scar tissue mass and transmurality while being faster than 2D imaging.
Supporting Evidence
- Mean image quality was similar for both 3D and 2D datasets.
- 3D imaging had a significantly shorter acquisition time compared to 2D imaging.
- Strong correlation was found between 2D and 3D datasets for myocardial mass and scar tissue mass.
- Agreement for scar transmurality detection was excellent between the two techniques.
Takeaway
This study looked at two ways to take pictures of heart scars, and found that the newer method is quicker but just as good.
Methodology
Ninety patients with myocardial infarction were imaged using both 3D and 2D techniques, and image quality and quantitative analyses were performed.
Participant Demographics
84 men, average age 54.4 years, average BMI 27.8 kg/m2.
Statistical Information
P-Value
p<0.001
Statistical Significance
p<0.001
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
Want to read the original?
Access the complete publication on the publisher's website