Vascular endothelial growth factor in node-positive breast cancer patients treated with adjuvant tamoxifen
2003

VEGF in Node-Positive Breast Cancer Patients on Tamoxifen

Sample size: 212 publication Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Coradini D, Biganzoli E, Pellizzaro C, Veneroni S, Oriana S, Ambrogi F, Erdas R, Boracchi P, Daidone M G, Marubini E

Primary Institution: Istituto Nazionale per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori, Milan, Italy

Hypothesis

Does the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) content in node-positive breast cancer patients affect their relapse-free survival when treated with adjuvant tamoxifen?

Conclusion

Higher levels of VEGF in tumors are associated with a shorter relapse-free survival in postmenopausal breast cancer patients treated with tamoxifen, especially when estrogen receptor levels are low.

Supporting Evidence

  • Patients with high VEGF levels had a significantly shorter relapse-free survival.
  • The study included 212 patients who were evaluated for VEGF content.
  • VEGF content did not show significant correlation with other variables considered.
  • Multivariate analysis indicated significant relationships between VEGF, ER levels, and prognosis.

Takeaway

This study found that in breast cancer patients taking tamoxifen, those with higher VEGF levels had a higher chance of their cancer coming back, especially if their estrogen receptors were low.

Methodology

The study evaluated VEGF content and steroid receptor profiles in postmenopausal women with node-positive breast cancer who received tamoxifen, analyzing their relapse-free survival using multivariate Cox regression.

Limitations

The model explained only 13.2% of the total heterogeneity of relapse times, indicating other factors may also influence outcomes.

Participant Demographics

Postmenopausal women with primary resectable invasive breast cancer, median age 64 years.

Statistical Information

P-Value

<0.0001

Confidence Interval

95% CI, 1.07–2.20

Statistical Significance

p<0.05

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1038/sj.bjc.6601060

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication