Development of the Knee Quality of Life (KQoL-26) 26-item questionnaire: data quality, reliability, validity and responsiveness
2008

Development of the KQoL-26 Questionnaire for Knee Quality of Life

Sample size: 559 publication 10 minutes Evidence: high

Author Information

Author(s): Garratt Andrew M, Brealey Stephen, Robling Michael, Atwell Chris, Russell Ian, Gillespie William, King David

Primary Institution: National Resource Centre for Rehabilitation in Rheumatology, Oslo, Norway

Hypothesis

The KQoL-26 questionnaire will effectively assess the impact of knee problems on patients' quality of life.

Conclusion

The KQoL-26 has good evidence for reliability, validity, and responsiveness, making it suitable for use in trials involving patients with knee injuries.

Supporting Evidence

  • The KQoL-26 showed high internal consistency with Cronbach's alpha ranging from 0.91 to 0.94.
  • Principal component analysis identified three scales: physical functioning, activity limitations, and emotional functioning.
  • The KQoL-26 demonstrated significant responsiveness with effect sizes ranging from 0.86 to 1.13.

Takeaway

The KQoL-26 is a new questionnaire that helps understand how knee problems affect people's lives, and it works well.

Methodology

The questionnaire was developed through patient interviews and focus groups, followed by statistical analysis for reliability and validity.

Potential Biases

Potential bias may arise from the self-reported nature of the questionnaire and the specific patient population sampled.

Limitations

The response rate for the postal survey was lower than expected, which may affect the generalizability of the findings.

Participant Demographics

Mean age of trial patients was 39.67 years, with 36.6% females; survey patients had a mean age of 47.02 years, with 43.5% females.

Statistical Information

Statistical Significance

p<0.01

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1186/1477-7525-6-48

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication